With the civil war and the "white terror" on one side and the "red terror" on the other, cut rail communications with farmers taking land motu proprio, with a notable increase of parcels for the subsistence and a large number of military expeditions in search of those who allegedly hoarded food, etc.. It was an odyssey to supply the cities. So abolished many farmers committee, began a campaign with the kulaks (peasant who is noted for its prosperity, have their own cattle and eventually hired labor). The government supported the middle peasants, it is the shade below, it is difficult to identify precisely who was a kulak. The peasants were Bolshevik revolution that gave them the land, but did not feel communists. The large cities suffered a strong migration to the countryside (Moscow lost 44% of its population, while industrial Petrograd lost 57%), most fled the city-served and many others went to war. While followed factories managed by the same people as before the revolution. There was, legally and out of the provisions, an exchange of goods between cities and countryside. The main problem was that the city had little to offer the field. Not to mention that the government's target, naturally so, was kept well victualled the military.
Self-discipline of the workers was not what the revolutionaries hoped ("Whoever does not work shall not eat"). Moreover, Lenin spoke (we estimate that given the difficult context) for the piece and Taylorism as a way of organizing work, even to take draconian measures. It established compulsory military service, work camps for prisoners, and labor camps even harder for the contras. Also successfully implanted with vague socialist Saturday in factories.
Finally, we start to discuss the role of trade unions Should be part of government or should maintain their independence?
0 comments:
Post a Comment